|
Attenders:
VRD Moderator: Corey Schultz |
AMICO
report: Trudy Jacoby
|
VRD travel award
History of the VR
profession: Maryly Snow
|
North
American Lantern Slide Survey: Jenni Rodda
ARLIS/NA President J. Brown and Vice-President M. Webster |
Conference Proposals
ARLIS/NA-VRA Summer Education Institute: Mary Wasserman
|
ARTstor Discussion
Discussion subsequent to the formal meeting
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laurie Glover, Sheryl
Brittig, Johanna Wolf, Spruill Harder, Gregory
Most, Trudy Jacoby, Helen Chillman, Adrienne Pritt, Becky Simmons, Pedro A.
Figueredo, Janice Woo, Dan Nolting, Nicole Warren, Sam Teplitzky, Erika
Rosenberg, Sandra Cowan, Marilyn Nasserden, Daniel Biddle, Judith Herschmann,
Beth Dodd, Linda Duychuak, Lynda S. White, Joan Stahl, Jessica Cline, Amanda
Stevenson, Dorothea Coiffe, Kristy Davis, Nicole Finzer, Christine Sundt,
Elizabeth Peck Learned,
Harriet Sonne de Torrens, Alix Reiskind, Susan Bresnan, Ann Burns, Leigh Gates,
Jenni Rodda, Elizabeth Schaub, Martha Walker, Juliet Riley, Eric Schwab, Kathe
Hicks Albrecht, Mark Pompelia, Lily Solmssen Moureaux, Corey Schultz, Maryly
Snow, Mary Wassermann, Carole Anne Fabien, Robert Carter, Margaret Webster,
Jeanne Brown,
Carol LeGrow, and Miranda Howard Haddock. |
|
|
| 1.VRD
Moderator: Corey Schultz |
|
|
Corey
described the situation that led up to his becoming the VRD Moderator. Giovanna
Jackson was 2003 Moderator, and Susan Miller was 2003 Moderator Elect. Giovanna
resigned her position in July due to personal reasons; Susan then became
Moderator until she resigned in November 2003. Corey was asked to serve as
Moderator in February, 2004. The Visual Resources Advisory Committee (VRAC) was
disbanded in 2003, and the VRD inherited some of the tasks of VRAC. The new VRD
description was rewritten by Giovanna Jackson, Jeanne Brown, Margaret Webster,
and Corey Schultz, and is posted on the VRD website.
Corey asked
for a volunteer to serve as the Incoming VRD Moderator: Jenni Rodda volunteered
and was accepted. Corey announced the formation of a VRD listserv. |
|
- |
| 2. AMICO
report: Trudy Jacoby |
|
|
Trudy
clarified that she is looking for information, not providing information. She
has heard that AMICO will cease to exist by Summer 2005. She has learned that
the AMICO image files are not currently available for downloading, meaning that
images found in AMICO can not be used by faculty in web pages or digital
presentations unless they use Insight as the presentation module. She the
following questions:
·
Are you or your institution downloading AMICO files into a local database?
Positive responses came from Art Images for College Teaching, Cornell,
Princeton.
·
Are institutions depending on AMICO as a teaching resource? Gregg Most replied
that AMICO will probably be taken over by ARTstor.
·
Will institutions be able to download images from ARTstor?
·
Is AMICO useful? Yes, especially teaching courses in history of photography.
AMICO is also useful as a component of digital image aggregations. Commentaries
in AMICO are especially useful for students. |
|
- |
| 3. VRD
travel award: Corey Schultz |
|
|
In the past,
the VRD sought to create a conference travel award for VR personnel. Corey
brought up the topic at the meeting. The results of the discussion are as
follows: the idea of a VRD travel award had been brought to the ARLIS/NA
Executive Board who thought it might be counter-productive to have an award for
a specific type of librarian. The consensus of opinion was to bring the idea
back to the Development Committee. There are many reasons to support this idea.
Primary among them is that VRD has been loosing membership and attendance to
VRA. This would help counter that trend. |
|
- |
| 4. History
of the VR profession: Maryly Snow |
|
|
Maryly thanked
Dan Nolting, VRD web master, for his additions to the History of the VR
Profession web page. It now includes some photos of early picture libraries, and
will soon include bios for Luraine Tansey and Dmitri Tselos. Maryly called for
more images and bios of important people to the VR profession, such as Betty Jo
Irvine, author of the book, Slide Libraries. Christine Sundt recommended
that we contact Nancy DeLaurier, now retired but still actively writing
histories, involved with MACAA (Middle America College Art Association), VRA’s
predecessor, the Slide Buyers’ Guide. Beth Dodd is the SAA (Society of
American Archivists) visual resources liaison. Maryly would like to see us
develop enough online resources and information about the history of our
profession that we could create a time-line showing, generally speaking, when
various visual resources media collections were developed and discarded,
important VR initiatives such as the AAT cataloging guidelines, Ancient Site
Names project, the VISION project, etc. |
|
- |
| 5. North
American Lantern Slide Survey: Jenni Rodda |
|
|
Jenni Rodda
reported on the North American Lantern Slide Survey (NALSS), a joint project of
ARLIS/NA and VRA, initiated by Maryly Snow and Jenni Rodda at the joint ARLIS
VRD meeting in St. Louis, 2002, the year of the joint ARLIS/VRA conference.
Phase 1 of the survey, data collection, will be extended to Sept 1. 2004. Phase
2 revision of entries, will run from September through December 31, 2004. We
will try to report on preliminary findings by the next conference, but a more
realistic date will probably be 2006.
Maryly stated
that lantern slide collections are a rich source of material to be digitized, as
slides created before 1923 are in the public domain. Chris Sundt mentioned the
value of mounted photograph collections as well. |
|
- |
| 6. Visit
by ARLIS/NA President Jeanne Brown and Vice-President Margaret Webster |
|
|
Reviving the
tradition of the ARLIS/NA incoming President and incoming Vice President (who
also serves as the liaison between the ARLIS/NA board and the Visual Resources
Division), Margaret and Jeanne introduced themselves. Margaret called for
conference proposals from VRD for the ARLIS/NA annual conference in Houston
2005. Due date for proposals is May 31, 2004. Any VRD special funding requests
are due to Lynda White, ARLIS/NA Treasurer, also by May 31, 2005. Minutes of
the VRD meeting are to be sent to Ted Goodman and Dan Nolting.
Jeanne
discussed ARLIS/NA’s process for revising the Strategic Plan, citing the
Strategic Plan forum after the ARLIS/NA Annual Membership meeting. She
discussed plans under way to revise the ARLIS web site by undertaking a review
of both content and navigation links, under the aegis of the ARLIS/NA
Publications Committee, chaired by Jack Robertson. She also informed us that
this is the largest conference attendance ever, with over 700 attendees,
including exhibitors, and a large number of international attendees. |
|
- |
| 7. Conference
Proposals |
|
|
Ideas for
conference proposals were generated:
·
Images in course management systems. Christine Sundt felt this would be
appropriate for an ARLIS session at CAA, as we need to be teaching our faculty.
·
Discussion of an ARLIS/AN Occasional Paper on teaching faculty how to use
digital images. Betsy Peck Learned and Ann Whiteside are proposing a VRA2005
session on teaching faculty. This session could be reprised as an ARLIS/CAA
session or merely as an ARLIS session, or both.
·
The digital initiatives workshop at VRA, presented by Trudy Levy, and Howard
Brainen, could be revised and restructured into a session: integration of
procedures when managing both analog and digital collections: tools we use;
successes and failures; etc. A set of building blocks for digital initiatives,
both in-house and consortial agreements. |
| |
| 8. ARLIS/NA-VRA
Summer Education Institute: Mary Wasserman |
|
The first
resurrection of MACAA and VRA’s “slide summer camp” will be held this July 2004
at Duke University, jointly sponsored by ARLIS/NA and VRA. Earlier concern over
whether the summer institute would loose money or not has been allayed by the
quickness in which registration filled up, 8 working days. Mark Pompelia was
responsible for the web site, Leigh Gates and Jenni Rodda for publicity. Joan
Taormina, Gregg Most, Margaret Webster on curriculum. After the SEI is over,
they will post materials covered on their website. Question of how to handle
the existing waiting list will be addressed after the conference. Aim is to
make the first summer institute successful. Then the committee will decide
whether to do more than one or expand according to space availability. They
project to generate an income of $12,000. The 2005 SEI will also be held at
Duke University. |
| |
| 9. ARTstor
Discussion |
|
Following
along much the same lines as the discussion about AMICO was a lively discussion
about ARTstor, one in which more concerns were raised than answers, because we
did not have an ARTstor representative present at the meeting. The discussion
included the following:
·
No consortial pricing will be available for three years, which many felt was
problematic, as the pricing is high at a time when libraries are cutting their
expenditures.
·
Price is quite expensive for collections that are still funded by departments,
not library systems.
·
ARTstor will have restrictions on use, such as downloading images to local
serves.
·
Because ARTstor is following the JSTOR model, it will eventually spin itself off
from Mellon support by bringing in money for the endowment to make it a
persistent resource.
·
One person commented that 384 x 384 image file size is easy to download but is
not suitable for projection. If you’re using a T-1 line, ARTstor is okay, but
painfully slow on a dial-up.
·
There are duplicate images of various quality in ARTstor, as there are 8 or 9
charter collections, including Illustrated BARTSCH, Carnegie Arts of the U.S.
·
The weak side is copystand imagery.
·
ARTstor wants to cluster duplicate images but hasn’t yet.
·
Do we continue to build individual collections, or do we begin developing
digital consortiums?
·
20th c. isn’t included yet.
·
A new client is in testing phase to make local collections of ARTstor, to enable
side by side projection, larger images, downloadable, and adding local
resources. It still isn’t suitable for projection yet, everyone says, but we
saw Amy Lucker presenting comparisons of Harvard Via and ARTstor images.
·
Students at testing institutions love ARTstor as a reference tool, not a
teaching tool.
·
Many institutions are holding off on starting their own digital projects, hoping
that ARTstor will meet all their needs.
·
There are no price breaks for contributors.
·
One advantage to subscribing now is that there is a permanent 15% discount for
institutions that subscribe in 2004. |
| |
| 10. Discussion
subsequent to the formal meeting. |
| |
Via e-mail in
the weeks following the VRD’s New York City meeting, Corey Schultz, Moderator;
Jenni Rodda, Moderator-Elect; and Maryly Snow, scribe for the formal meeting,
discussed with Giovanna Jackson, past Moderator, ongoing issues of importance to
the VRD’s members. The idea of a VRD travel award was revisited, and ideas for
ensuring continuity of leadership were exchanged.
It
has been suggested that the leadership of the VRD be changed, to include a third
officer—Secretary—responsible for minutes and any needed correspondence. The
Secretary’s term would extend for one year (conference to conference), at which
point the Secretary becomes the Moderator-Elect, and a new Secretary is chosen.
It is understood that this change in leadership requires approval of the ARLIS
Board; please consider this a request for such approval.
Proposed job description:
Secretary shall take minutes
at all VRD meetings; shall be available to fill in for the VRD Moderator or the
Incoming Moderator as needed;
shall be available to consult with the VRD Moderator and Incoming Moderator
throughout the year on issues as they arise; shall succeed the following year to
Incoming Moderator, and the year thereafter to Moderator, assuring VRD of
continuity. |
| |
Minutes taken by Maryly Snow |
|