|
Attendance | Welcome | Approval of LA meeting minutes | Election of Officers
| Thanks to Members | Joint Task Force on Continuing Education | Baltimore Session Ideas |
Other Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attendance |
|
|
Lynda White, Jenni
Rodda, Maryly Snow, Carol Campbell, Barbara Opar, Susan
Miller, Mary Stein, Leigh Gates, Eileen Fry, Sheri
Rosenzweig, Eric Schwab, Jennifer Hehman, Alma Koppedraijer,
Margaret Webster, Miranda Haddock, Daphne Dufresne, Sara
Jane Pearman, Libby Kieffer, Ann Burns, Manuel Berumen,
Gregory Most, Betsy Peck Learned, Debra Kruse, Norine
Duncan, Ann Whiteside, Barbara Treitel, Christin Ronolder,
Paula Hardin, Mary Wassermann, Giovanna Jackson, Sheryl
Wilhite |
|
|
| 1.Welcome |
|
|
Mary Wassermann
welcomed members to the meeting, and introduced herself as
2001-2002 Moderator and Sheryl Wilhite as 2002-2003
Moderator. |
|
- |
| 2. Approval of LA
meeting minutes |
|
|
Minutes from the
2001 meeting of the VRD were approved. |
|
- |
| 3. Election of
Officers |
|
|
Giovanna
Jackson had agreed to run for Vice-Moderator /
Moderator-Elect. There was a call for further
nominations from the floor. Giovanna was approved as the new
Vice-Moderator. |
|
- |
| 4. Thanks to
Members |
|
|
Mary expressed
thanks to Daniel Nolting for his continuing work on and
hosting of the VRD website http://www.bethanywv.edu/vrd/
* (recently moved to: http://www.chatham.edu/users/staff/dnolting/
, effective 1/31/2003)
She thanked Sheryl for editing
the VRD Update Column, and Gregg Most for his great work as
Past-Moderator. Mary also thanked those members who
worked on 2002 conference sessions, many of which came out
of ideas expressed at last year’s VRD
meeting. |
|
- |
| 5. Joint Task Force
on Continuing Education |
|
|
Mary reported
on the Joint Task Force for Continuing Education, which she
co-chairs with John Taormina from VRA. The committee
is made up of about 12 members from both ARLIS/NA and VRA,
and will meet at the St. Louis conference. They
initially will focus on the Summer School to be held at Rice
University in Houston in 2003. This course will be
modeled on the former UT-Austin summer course, but will be
updated and changed somewhat. It is expected that both
the VRD and VRA websites will serve as good resources for
students to find the tools of these summer sessions.
It is possible that a site for Continuing Education may be
created. |
|
- |
| 6. Baltimore Session
Ideas |
|
|
Giovanna asked
about the possibility of continuing the sessions on
non-western cataloging. Marty Stein reported that the
Indigenous Art and Culture Round Table was looking for a new
Moderator, and that discussions about co-sponsoring
non-western sessions might recommence once the new Moderator
was in place. Jenni Rodda mentioned the Denny
project, and suggested a round table on the shared
cataloging of Islamic subjects. Eileen Fry suggested that, due to
Baltimore’s proximity to the Winterthur Museum, that VRD
could co-sponsor something with the Decorative Arts Round
Table. Betsy Learned
suggested a session on redesigning library and VR collection
spaces, since there is interest from the Architecture
Section and VRD could co-sponsor.
Miranda Haddock expressed
interest in working with Betsy on this session. Maryly
Snow reported that the Standards Committee asked if the VRD
is working on facilities standards for electronic
collections/libraries. This could tie into a
redesigning space session. David Austin of Standards Committee
could be contacted about co-sponsoring, as well.
Commenting on electronic
collections, Eileen remarked that image compilations
don’t work when they are cataloged as a single entity (such
as a CD of multiple images). She asked how one finds
out who is using one’s digital resources and who is in
charge of monitoring their use and usefulness? Betsy
remarked that they (Roger Williams) are being pushed to
enhance their library catalog with images, and that it is
important for us to educate our non-VR colleagues that the
data about images must accompany the images for them to be
useful. Jennifer Hehman suggested that the VRD
might sponsor a panel of different aggregators of images on
the web, and that we organize finding aids to online
images. This generated discussion about a session on
“Selling and Acquiring Image Resources” that would cover the
changing world of image searching and licensing, and that
could be co-sponsored by the Reference Section. The
session could also cover access and management/ownership,
and problems that arise when the group that purchases the
images don’t provide the content.
Other topics for inclusion
could be desegregating the image collection/set, and whether
we should be purchasing CDs of selected images or whether
vendors might eventually license entire collections.
Vendors, such as Saskia, could be invited to participate in
the session. The next
session idea was related to disaster planning. Since
there are many resources related to disaster planning and
how to salvage analog materials, such a session could
incorporate how to preserve electronic materials as
well. It could also focus more heavily on how to
provide material for a course within an extremely short time
period, and whether a course could be taught solely using
images found on the web. Further, we could explore whether one
should rebuild with analog slides, or go fully to a digital
collection after major disaster. Betsy thought that
this might make a good occasional paper. Maryly
remarked that we could incorporate issues of insurance and
risk management. Susan Miller expressed interest in
working on this session, and will ask Martha Mahard and
Andrea Cox if they are also interested. Mary announced that all session
proposals should be sent to Sheryl
Wilhite. Deadline for submission of proposals is
May 1, 2002. |
|
- |
| 7. Other
Business |
|
|
Maryly introduced
the topic of visual copy history, stating that we have
little visual history of our own work. She would like
to see pictorial documentation on the web, and is looking
for images up to 1960. She asked that historical material be
sent to her. Eileen
asked about the National Lantern Slide project, and if
anyone is digitizing lantern slides. She is concerned
that there is no coordination in this
effort. Gregg suggested that this is an issue
for ArtSTOR, since they are looking for content.
Maryly suggested that we need to start collecting data on
who has lantern slides, what they are, and how they are
being stored. We should also determine which images are
unique and which are not. A directory could then be
presented to ArtSTOR. Jenni volunteered to design a simple
survey to put on the VRD and VRA websites (with permission
of VRA). Maryly asked how one can tell if a
lantern slide is from a commercial vendor or copy
photography; Eileen responded that they pretty much have to
be taken apart in order to determine that. Leigh Gates mentioned that more than
half of the attendees at the New Member Orientation were VR
people. |
|
- |
|
Meeting was
adjourned. |
|
- |
|
Respectfully
submitted, Sheryl L.
Wilhite |
| |